Timor-Leste vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees
Timor-Leste
155.7%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
70.0%
in 2019
Timor-Leste rank
1st
Zimbabwe rank
4th
Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees over time
- Timor-Leste
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 155.7% against 70.0% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 85.7%.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 2.2 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Timor-Leste ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 191 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: attorney fees, Timor-Leste or Zimbabwe?
- Timor-Leste, at 155.7% against 70.0% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: attorney fees between Timor-Leste and Zimbabwe?
- 85.7%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Timor-Leste and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Timor-Leste and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: attorney fees?
- Timor-Leste ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The attorney fees are the fees that plaintiff must advance to a local attorney in the standardized case, regardless of final reimbursement.