Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees
Papua New Guinea
82.8%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
70.0%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
3rd
Zimbabwe rank
4th
Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 82.8% against 70.0% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 12.8%.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 3rd and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: attorney fees, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
- Papua New Guinea, at 82.8% against 70.0% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: attorney fees between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 12.8%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: attorney fees?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 3rd and Zimbabwe ranks 4th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The attorney fees are the fees that plaintiff must advance to a local attorney in the standardized case, regardless of final reimbursement.