Papua New Guinea vs Timor-Leste: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees
Papua New Guinea
82.8%
in 2019
Timor-Leste
155.7%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
3rd
Timor-Leste rank
1st
Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 155.7% against 82.8% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 72.9%.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.9 times Papua New Guinea's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 3rd and Timor-Leste ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: attorney fees, Papua New Guinea or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 155.7% against 82.8% in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: attorney fees between Papua New Guinea and Timor-Leste?
- 72.9%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Timor-Leste?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Timor-Leste rank globally for enforcing contracts: attorney fees?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 3rd and Timor-Leste ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The attorney fees are the fees that plaintiff must advance to a local attorney in the standardized case, regardless of final reimbursement.