China vs Eritrea: Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees
China
8.7%
in 2019
Eritrea
9.0%
in 2019
China rank
178th
Eritrea rank
175th
Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees over time
- China
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 9.0% against 8.7% in China, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
China ranks 178th and Eritrea ranks 175th of 191 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: attorney fees, China or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 9.0% against 8.7% in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: attorney fees between China and Eritrea?
- 0.3%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eritrea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do China and Eritrea rank globally for enforcing contracts: attorney fees?
- China ranks 178th and Eritrea ranks 175th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Attorney fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The attorney fees are the fees that plaintiff must advance to a local attorney in the standardized case, regardless of final reimbursement.