Türkiye vs Viet Nam: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time
- Türkiye
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in Viet Nam, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Türkiye ranks 19th and Viet Nam ranks 19th of 190 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Türkiye or Viet Nam?
- Türkiye, at 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in Viet Nam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Türkiye and Viet Nam?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Türkiye and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Türkiye and Viet Nam rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- Türkiye ranks 19th and Viet Nam ranks 19th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.