Switzerland vs United States: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time
- Switzerland
- United States
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in United States, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
Switzerland ranks 19th and United States ranks 19th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Switzerland or United States?
- Switzerland, at 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in United States as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Switzerland and United States?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Switzerland and United States?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Switzerland and United States rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- Switzerland ranks 19th and United States ranks 19th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.