Solomon Islands vs United States: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)

Solomon Islands
2.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
United States
2.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Solomon Islands rank
19th
United States rank
19th

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • United States
00.511.522.5201520172019

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in United States, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Solomon Islands ranks 19th and United States ranks 19th of 190 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Solomon Islands or United States?
Solomon Islands, at 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in United States as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Solomon Islands and United States?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and United States?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Solomon Islands and United States rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
Solomon Islands ranks 19th and United States ranks 19th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs United States: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3). Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/solomon-islands/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/solomon-islands/united-states/">Solomon Islands vs United States: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.