Madagascar, Republic of vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)

Madagascar, Republic of
2.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
South Africa
2.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Madagascar, Republic of rank
19th
South Africa rank
19th

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time

  • Madagascar, Republic of
  • South Africa
00.511.522.5201520172019

How they compare

Madagascar, Republic of currently reports 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in South Africa, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Madagascar, Republic of ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 19th of 190 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Madagascar, Republic of or South Africa?
Madagascar, Republic of, at 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in South Africa as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Madagascar, Republic of and South Africa?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Madagascar, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar, Republic of and South Africa?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Madagascar, Republic of and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
Madagascar, Republic of ranks 19th and South Africa ranks 19th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar, Republic of vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/madagascar/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/madagascar/south-africa/">Madagascar, Republic of vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.