Kyrgyzstan vs San Marino: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)

Kyrgyzstan
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
San Marino
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
170th
San Marino rank
170th

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • San Marino
00.511.5201520172019

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in San Marino, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 170th and San Marino ranks 170th of 191 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Kyrgyzstan or San Marino?
Kyrgyzstan, at 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in San Marino as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Kyrgyzstan and San Marino?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and San Marino?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Kyrgyzstan and San Marino rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 170th and San Marino ranks 170th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs San Marino: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3). Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/san-marino/">Kyrgyzstan vs San Marino: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.