Kyrgyzstan vs Netherlands: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)

Kyrgyzstan
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Netherlands
1.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
169th
Netherlands rank
169th

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Netherlands
00.511.5201520172019

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in Netherlands, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 169th and Netherlands ranks 169th of 190 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Kyrgyzstan or Netherlands?
Kyrgyzstan, at 1.5 DB16-20 methodology against 1.5 DB16-20 methodology in Netherlands as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Kyrgyzstan and Netherlands?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Netherlands?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Netherlands rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 169th and Netherlands ranks 169th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Netherlands: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3). Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/netherlands/">Kyrgyzstan vs Netherlands: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.