Kosovo vs Spain: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time
- Kosovo
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Kosovo, a difference of 1 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Spain's figure about 1.5 times Kosovo's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 1 groups.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Kosovo or Spain?
- Spain, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Kosovo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Kosovo and Spain?
- 1 DB16-20 methodology, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Spain?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Kosovo and Spain rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- Kosovo ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 1 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.