South Korea vs Poland: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time
- South Korea
- Poland
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Poland, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), South Korea or Poland?
- South Korea, at 3 DB16-20 methodology against 3 DB16-20 methodology in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between South Korea and Poland?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Poland rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- South Korea ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.