Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time
- Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
- Peru
How they compare
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China currently reports 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 19th and Peru ranks 19th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China or Peru?
- Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, at 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Peru?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 19th and Peru ranks 19th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.