Eswatini, Kingdom of vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)

Eswatini, Kingdom of
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Eswatini, Kingdom of rank
117th
New Zealand rank
117th

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time

  • Eswatini, Kingdom of
  • New Zealand
00.511.52201520172019

How they compare

Eswatini, Kingdom of currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 117th and New Zealand ranks 117th of 190 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Eswatini, Kingdom of or New Zealand?
Eswatini, Kingdom of, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in New Zealand as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Eswatini, Kingdom of and New Zealand?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Eswatini, Kingdom of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini, Kingdom of and New Zealand?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Eswatini, Kingdom of and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 117th and New Zealand ranks 117th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini, Kingdom of vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/eswatini/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/eswatini/new-zealand/">Eswatini, Kingdom of vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.