Equatorial Guinea vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sudan
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Sudan, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 117th and Sudan ranks 117th of 188 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Equatorial Guinea or Sudan?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Equatorial Guinea and Sudan?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 117th and Sudan ranks 117th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.