Ecuador vs Sweden: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time
- Ecuador
- Sweden
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 19th and Sweden ranks 19th of 188 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Ecuador or Sweden?
- Ecuador, at 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Ecuador and Sweden?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and Sweden rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- Ecuador ranks 19th and Sweden ranks 19th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.