Burkina Faso vs Ecuador: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)

Burkina Faso
2.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Ecuador
2.5 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
19th
Ecuador rank
19th

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Ecuador
00.511.522.5201520172019

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in Ecuador, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 19th and Ecuador ranks 19th of 190 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Burkina Faso or Ecuador?
Burkina Faso, at 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Burkina Faso and Ecuador?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Ecuador?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Burkina Faso and Ecuador rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
Burkina Faso ranks 19th and Ecuador ranks 19th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Ecuador: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/burkina-faso/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/burkina-faso/ecuador/">Burkina Faso vs Ecuador: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.