Bulgaria vs Malta: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time
- Bulgaria
- Malta
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in Malta, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Bulgaria ranks 19th and Malta ranks 19th of 188 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Bulgaria or Malta?
- Bulgaria, at 2.5 DB16-20 methodology against 2.5 DB16-20 methodology in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Bulgaria and Malta?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bulgaria and Malta rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- Bulgaria ranks 19th and Malta ranks 19th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.