Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mongolia: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Mongolia
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
117th
Mongolia rank
117th

Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Mongolia
00.511.52201520172019

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Mongolia, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 117th and Mongolia ranks 117th of 191 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Mongolia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Mongolia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolia?
0 DB16-20 methodology, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mongolia rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 117th and Mongolia ranks 117th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mongolia: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3). Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-alternative-dispute-resolution-0-3-db16-20-methodology/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mongolia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mongolia: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.