Argentina vs Puerto Rico: Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3)
Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) over time
- Argentina
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 117th and Puerto Rico ranks 117th of 188 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3), Argentina or Puerto Rico?
- Argentina, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in Puerto Rico as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3) between Argentina and Puerto Rico?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Puerto Rico?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Puerto Rico rank globally for enforcing contracts: alternative dispute resolution (0-3)?
- Argentina ranks 117th and Puerto Rico ranks 117th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Alternative dispute resolution (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The alternative dispute resolution evaluates two aspects: (i) whether domestic commercial arbitration is regulated by law, all disputes can be submitted to arbitration and valid arbitration clauses are usually enforced by courts; and (ii) whether voluntary mediation and/or conciliation are a recognized way of resolving commercial disputes, they are regulated by law and there are financial incentives for parties to attempt mediation of conciliation. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.