China vs Latvia: Employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-64, urban
China
0.2%
in 2013
Latvia
0.2%
in 2016
China rank
58th
Latvia rank
60th
Employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-64, urban over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Latvia ahead.
China ranks 58th and Latvia ranks 60th of 88 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-64, urban, China or Latvia?
- China, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Latvia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-64, urban between China and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2013.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-64, urban?
- China ranks 58th and Latvia ranks 60th of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Employment in the commerce sector, aged 15-64, urban (% of urban employed population in working age). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.