Chile vs South Africa: Employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-64, rural
Chile
0.8%
in 2017
South Africa
0.8%
in 2020
Chile rank
3rd
South Africa rank
5th
Employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-64, rural over time
- Chile
- South Africa
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.8% against 0.8% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 5th of 21 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.1% | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.1% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-64, rural, Chile or South Africa?
- Chile, at 0.8% against 0.8% in South Africa as of 2017.
- What is the difference in employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-64, rural between Chile and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Chile and South Africa rank globally for employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-64, rural?
- Chile ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 5th of 21 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Employed workers with a work contract, aged 15-64, rural (% of rural employed population in working age). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.