How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sri Lanka?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers

Guatemala

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Sri Lanka

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Guatemala rank

41st

Sri Lanka rank

42nd

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers over time

Guatemala
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Guatemala ranks 41st and Sri Lanka ranks 42nd of 163 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guatemala	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Sri Lanka
1970s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Sri Lanka
1980s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Sri Lanka
1990s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Sri Lanka
2000s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Sri Lanka
2010s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, Guatemala or Sri Lanka?: Guatemala, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers between Guatemala and Sri Lanka?: 0 units per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sri Lanka?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Guatemala and Sri Lanka rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers?: Guatemala ranks 41st and Sri Lanka ranks 42nd of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sri-lanka/">Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 163 places, 8,046 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.