Ecuador vs Mexico: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers

Ecuador
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Mexico
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Ecuador rank
70th
Mexico rank
71st

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mexico
000000196119902019

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Ecuador ranks 70th and Mexico ranks 71st of 163 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, Ecuador or Mexico?
Ecuador, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers between Ecuador and Mexico?
0 units per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mexico?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Mexico rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers?
Ecuador ranks 70th and Mexico ranks 71st of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mexico: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/mexico/">Ecuador vs Mexico: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 8,046 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.