Belarus vs Uzbekistan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers

Belarus
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Uzbekistan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Belarus rank
35th
Uzbekistan rank
38th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers over time

  • Belarus
  • Uzbekistan
000000199220052019

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Uzbekistan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 35th and Uzbekistan ranks 38th of 163 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, Belarus or Uzbekistan?
Belarus, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers between Belarus and Uzbekistan?
0 units per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uzbekistan?
28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Uzbekistan rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers?
Belarus ranks 35th and Uzbekistan ranks 38th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Uzbekistan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-per-square-kilometre/belarus/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-per-square-kilometre/belarus/uzbekistan/">Belarus vs Uzbekistan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
163 places, 8,046 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.