Ecuador vs South Africa: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers

Ecuador
-9.69 % change on previous year
in 2019
South Africa
-10.14 % change on previous year
in 2019
Ecuador rank
130th
South Africa rank
133rd

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Africa
-1000100200300196219902019

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -9.69 % change on previous year against -10.14 % change on previous year in South Africa, a difference of 0.45 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 32 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 130th and South Africa ranks 133rd of 164 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 44.41 % change on previous year 14.08 % change on previous year 30.33 % change on previous year Ecuador
1970s 30.6 % change on previous year 10.75 % change on previous year 19.85 % change on previous year Ecuador
1980s 2.8 % change on previous year 0.2003 % change on previous year 2.6 % change on previous year Ecuador
1990s 5.63 % change on previous year 1.12 % change on previous year 4.51 % change on previous year Ecuador
2000s 19.79 % change on previous year 1.71 % change on previous year 18.08 % change on previous year Ecuador
2010s 2.86 % change on previous year 0.5019 % change on previous year 2.36 % change on previous year Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers, Ecuador or South Africa?
Ecuador, at -9.69 % change on previous year against -10.14 % change on previous year in South Africa as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers between Ecuador and South Africa?
0.45 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
58 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - synthetic fertilizers?
Ecuador ranks 130th and South Africa ranks 133rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Africa: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-synthetic-fertilizers-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/south-africa/">Ecuador vs South Africa: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 7,797 data points, 1962–2019
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Synthetic Fertilizers. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.