Sweden vs Taiwan, China: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Sweden
0.2237
in 2050
Taiwan, China
0.2515
in 2050
Sweden rank
127th
Taiwan, China rank
126th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Sweden
  • Taiwan, China
0.10.20.30.4196120052050

How they compare

Taiwan, China currently reports 0.2515 against 0.2237 in Sweden, a difference of 0.0278.

That makes Taiwan, China's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 127th and Taiwan, China ranks 126th of 192 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 7 and Taiwan, China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Taiwan, China Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3278 0.0967 0.2311 Sweden
1970s 0.2707 0.1037 0.1669 Sweden
1980s 0.2663 0.1379 0.1284 Sweden
1990s 0.2646 0.196 0.0686 Sweden
2000s 0.2499 0.2074 0.0425 Sweden
2010s 0.2362 0.1775 0.0587 Sweden
2030s 0.2382 0.2294 0.0088 Sweden
2050s 0.2237 0.2515 0.0278 Taiwan, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Sweden or Taiwan, China?
Taiwan, China, at 0.2515 against 0.2237 in Sweden as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Sweden and Taiwan, China?
0.0278, with Taiwan, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Taiwan, China?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Sweden and Taiwan, China rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Sweden ranks 127th and Taiwan, China ranks 126th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Taiwan, China: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture/sweden/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture/sweden/taiwan/">Sweden vs Taiwan, China: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
194 places, 10,721 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).