Netherlands vs Tajikistan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Netherlands
0.5851
in 2050
Tajikistan
0.546
in 2050
Netherlands rank
100th
Tajikistan rank
101st

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Netherlands
  • Tajikistan
00.20.40.60.8196120052050

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 0.5851 against 0.546 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.0391.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Netherlands ahead.

Netherlands ranks 100th and Tajikistan ranks 101st of 194 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 4 and Tajikistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7327 0.3673 0.3654 Netherlands
2000s 0.6459 0.415 0.2309 Netherlands
2010s 0.654 0.6861 0.0321 Tajikistan
2030s 0.6244 0.5037 0.1207 Netherlands
2050s 0.5851 0.546 0.0391 Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Netherlands or Tajikistan?
Netherlands, at 0.5851 against 0.546 in Tajikistan as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Netherlands and Tajikistan?
0.0391, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Tajikistan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
How do Netherlands and Tajikistan rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Netherlands ranks 100th and Tajikistan ranks 101st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands vs Tajikistan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture/netherlands/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture/netherlands/tajikistan/">Netherlands vs Tajikistan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
194 places, 10,721 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).