Jamaica vs North Macedonia: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Jamaica
0.1808
in 2050
North Macedonia
0.1665
in 2050
Jamaica rank
134th
North Macedonia rank
137th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Jamaica
  • North Macedonia
00.10.20.3196120052050

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 0.1808 against 0.1665 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0143.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Jamaica ranks 134th and North Macedonia ranks 137th of 194 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1697 0.2298 0.0601 North Macedonia
2000s 0.1453 0.149 0.0037 North Macedonia
2010s 0.1132 0.1098 0.0034 Jamaica
2030s 0.1614 0.1706 0.0092 North Macedonia
2050s 0.1808 0.1665 0.0143 Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Jamaica or North Macedonia?
Jamaica, at 0.1808 against 0.1665 in North Macedonia as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Jamaica and North Macedonia?
0.0143, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and North Macedonia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
How do Jamaica and North Macedonia rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Jamaica ranks 134th and North Macedonia ranks 137th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs North Macedonia: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture/jamaica/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture/jamaica/north-macedonia/">Jamaica vs North Macedonia: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
194 places, 10,721 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).