Costa Rica vs Norway: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Costa Rica
0.406
in 2050
Norway
0.3621
in 2050
Costa Rica rank
110th
Norway rank
112th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Norway
00.20.40.6196120052050

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.406 against 0.3621 in Norway, a difference of 0.0439.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 110th and Norway ranks 112th of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 7 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3342 0.3311 0.0031 Costa Rica
1970s 0.4853 0.2801 0.2052 Costa Rica
1980s 0.6166 0.3278 0.2888 Costa Rica
1990s 0.4907 0.3416 0.1491 Costa Rica
2000s 0.3202 0.3341 0.0138 Norway
2010s 0.3499 0.3223 0.0276 Costa Rica
2030s 0.3756 0.3505 0.0251 Costa Rica
2050s 0.406 0.3621 0.0439 Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Costa Rica or Norway?
Costa Rica, at 0.406 against 0.3621 in Norway as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Costa Rica and Norway?
0.0439, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Norway?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Costa Rica and Norway rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Costa Rica ranks 110th and Norway ranks 112th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Norway: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture/costa-rica/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture/costa-rica/norway/">Costa Rica vs Norway: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
194 places, 10,721 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).