Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Belarus
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Belarus rank
112th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
111th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Belarus
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00000197019942019

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Belarus, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 112th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 111th of 188 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Belarus
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Belarus or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Belarus as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Belarus ranks 112th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 111th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/sao-tome-and-principe/">Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 9,346 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.