South Sudan vs Tonga: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture
South Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Tonga
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan rank
45th
Tonga rank
46th
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time
- South Sudan
- Tonga
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Tonga, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Tonga ahead.
South Sudan ranks 45th and Tonga ranks 46th of 190 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, South Sudan or Tonga?
- South Sudan, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Tonga as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between South Sudan and Tonga?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Tonga?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do South Sudan and Tonga rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
- South Sudan ranks 45th and Tonga ranks 46th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.