Nicaragua vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Nicaragua
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
42nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
41st

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00000196119902019

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 42nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 41st of 190 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 5 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Nicaragua or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Nicaragua and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Tanzania, United Republic of?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Nicaragua and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Nicaragua ranks 42nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 41st of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/tanzania/">Nicaragua vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.