Malta vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture
Malta
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Malta rank
47th
South Sudan rank
45th
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time
- Malta
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 47th and South Sudan ranks 45th of 190 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Malta or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Malta and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Malta and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
- Malta ranks 47th and South Sudan ranks 45th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.