Guatemala vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture
Guatemala
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Guatemala rank
48th
South Sudan rank
45th
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time
- Guatemala
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 48th and South Sudan ranks 45th of 190 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Guatemala or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Guatemala and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
- Guatemala ranks 48th and South Sudan ranks 45th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.