Ecuador vs Romania: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Ecuador
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Romania
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Ecuador rank
97th
Romania rank
96th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Ecuador
  • Romania
00000196119902019

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Ecuador ranks 97th and Romania ranks 96th of 190 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Ecuador or Romania?
Romania, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Ecuador and Romania?
0 units per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Romania?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Romania rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Ecuador ranks 97th and Romania ranks 96th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Romania: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/romania/">Ecuador vs Romania: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.