Congo vs Finland: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Congo
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Finland
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Congo rank
178th
Finland rank
177th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Congo
  • Finland
000000196119902019

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 178th and Finland ranks 177th of 190 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Congo or Finland?
Finland, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Congo and Finland?
0 units per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Finland?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Congo and Finland rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Congo ranks 178th and Finland ranks 177th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Finland: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/finland/">Congo vs Finland: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.