Canada vs Congo: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Canada
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Congo
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Canada rank
181st
Congo rank
178th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Canada
  • Congo
00000196119902019

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.4 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 181st and Congo ranks 178th of 190 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 5 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Canada or Congo?
Congo, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Canada as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Canada and Congo?
0 units per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Congo?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Canada and Congo rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Canada ranks 181st and Congo ranks 178th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Congo: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-square-kilometre/canada/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-per-square-kilometre/canada/congo-rep/">Canada vs Congo: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.