Ecuador vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture
Ecuador
5.36 % change on previous year
in 2019
South Sudan
5.49 % change on previous year
in 2019
Ecuador rank
13th
South Sudan rank
11th
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time
- Ecuador
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 5.49 % change on previous year against 5.36 % change on previous year in Ecuador, a difference of 0.13 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was South Sudan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 13th and South Sudan ranks 11th of 190 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Ecuador or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 5.49 % change on previous year against 5.36 % change on previous year in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 0.13 % change on previous year, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Sudan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
- Ecuador ranks 13th and South Sudan ranks 11th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.