Bahamas vs Eswatini: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture

Bahamas
0 % change on previous year
in 2019
Eswatini
0.1906 % change on previous year
in 2019
Bahamas rank
113th
Eswatini rank
110th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture over time

  • Bahamas
  • Eswatini
-40-2002040196219902019

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.1906 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Bahamas, a difference of 0.1906 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 24 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Eswatini ahead.

Bahamas ranks 113th and Eswatini ranks 110th of 190 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0777 % change on previous year 0.2066 % change on previous year 0.1289 % change on previous year Eswatini
1970s -3.8 % change on previous year 1.91 % change on previous year 5.72 % change on previous year Eswatini
1980s 1.73 % change on previous year 0.359 % change on previous year 1.37 % change on previous year Bahamas
1990s 3.48 % change on previous year -0.4901 % change on previous year 3.97 % change on previous year Bahamas
2000s 1.77 % change on previous year -0.2679 % change on previous year 2.03 % change on previous year Bahamas
2010s 0.1994 % change on previous year 0.4346 % change on previous year 0.2351 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture, Bahamas or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.1906 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Bahamas as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture between Bahamas and Eswatini?
0.1906 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Eswatini?
58 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2019.
How do Bahamas and Eswatini rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure left on pasture?
Bahamas ranks 113th and Eswatini ranks 110th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Eswatini: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-annual-growth-rate/bahamas-the/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-left-on-pasture-annual-growth-rate/bahamas-the/eswatini/">Bahamas vs Eswatini: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 9,937 data points, 1962–2019
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.