Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils

Afghanistan
0.8991
in 2050
Guatemala
0.9286
in 2050
Afghanistan rank
45th
Guatemala rank
42nd

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Guatemala
0.20.40.60.81196120052050

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.9286 against 0.8991 in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.0295.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 45th and Guatemala ranks 42nd of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 4 and Guatemala in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4139 0.1289 0.285 Afghanistan
1970s 0.4118 0.1632 0.2486 Afghanistan
1980s 0.3373 0.1684 0.169 Afghanistan
1990s 0.3388 0.2448 0.094 Afghanistan
2000s 0.3749 0.4141 0.0392 Guatemala
2010s 0.485 0.4886 0.0036 Guatemala
2030s 0.6341 0.6668 0.0327 Guatemala
2050s 0.8991 0.9286 0.0295 Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, Afghanistan or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.9286 against 0.8991 in Afghanistan as of 2050.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils between Afghanistan and Guatemala?
0.0295, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Guatemala?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Afghanistan and Guatemala rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils?
Afghanistan ranks 45th and Guatemala ranks 42nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT, published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils. Statizoid, drawing on FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils/afghanistan/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils/afghanistan/guatemala/">Afghanistan vs Guatemala: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils
Source
FAO, FAOSTAT Climate Change, Emissions Totals, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
194 places, 10,721 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated from agriculture and forest land. They consist of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from crop and livestock activities, forest management and include land use and land use change processes. Data are computed at Tier 1 of the IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Estimates are available by country, with global coverage for the period 1961–2019 with projections for 2030 and 2050 for some categories of emissions or 1990–2019 for others. The database is updated annually. The FAOSTAT domain Emissions Totals disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions/removals and their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 106 kg). The latter are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014).