Hong Kong, China vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils

Hong Kong, China
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Rwanda
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
34th
Rwanda rank
33rd

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Rwanda
000000196119902019

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 190 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, Hong Kong, China or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils between Hong Kong, China and Rwanda?
0 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Rwanda?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong, China and Rwanda rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils?
Hong Kong, China ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 33rd of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/">Hong Kong, China vs Rwanda: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.