Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Macao: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
0 units per person
in 2019
Macao
0 units per person
in 2019
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
187th
Macao rank
184th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Macao
00000196119902019

How they compare

Macao currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 0 units per person.

That makes Macao's figure about 1.3 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 187th and Macao ranks 184th of 190 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the averaged higher in 4 and Macao in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Macao Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per person 0 units per person 0 units per person Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1970s 0 units per person 0 units per person 0 units per person Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1980s 0 units per person 0 units per person 0 units per person Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1990s 0 units per person 0 units per person 0 units per person Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2000s 0 units per person 0 units per person 0 units per person Macao
2010s 0 units per person 0 units per person 0 units per person Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Macao?
Macao, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Macao?
0 units per person, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Macao?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Macao rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - manure applied to soils?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 187th and Macao ranks 184th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Macao: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils-per-capita/congo-dem-rep/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-manure-applied-to-soils-per-capita/congo-dem-rep/macao-sar-china/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Macao: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 10,156 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.