Ecuador vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per

Ecuador
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Micronesia, Federated States of
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Ecuador rank
88th
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
90th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Micronesia, Federated States of
0000196119902019

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Micronesia, Federated States of's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 88th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 90th of 191 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Micronesia, Federated States of Difference Ahead
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Ecuador
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Ecuador
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per, Ecuador or Micronesia, Federated States of?
Ecuador, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per between Ecuador and Micronesia, Federated States of?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Micronesia, Federated States of?
29 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per?
Ecuador ranks 88th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 90th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-ipcc-agriculture-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-ipcc-agriculture-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/micronesia-fed-sts/">Ecuador vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 9,477 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.