Kiribati vs Norway: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per

Kiribati
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Norway
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Kiribati rank
165th
Norway rank
163rd

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per over time

  • Kiribati
  • Norway
0000196119902019

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 165th and Norway ranks 163rd of 193 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per, Kiribati or Norway?
Norway, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per between Kiribati and Norway?
0 units per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Norway?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Kiribati and Norway rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - ipcc agriculture, per?
Kiribati ranks 165th and Norway ranks 163rd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Norway: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-ipcc-agriculture-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/norway/">Kiribati vs Norway: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
193 places, 10,337 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.