Mauritius vs South Sudan: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per
Mauritius
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Sudan
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Mauritius rank
142nd
South Sudan rank
141st
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per over time
- Mauritius
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 142nd and South Sudan ranks 141st of 184 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per, Mauritius or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per between Mauritius and South Sudan?
- 0 units per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and South Sudan rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per?
- Mauritius ranks 142nd and South Sudan ranks 141st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.