Ecuador vs Mali: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per

Ecuador
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Mali
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Ecuador rank
99th
Mali rank
102nd

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mali
000000196119902019

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Mali, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 99th and Mali ranks 102nd of 184 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mali Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per, Ecuador or Mali?
Ecuador, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Mali as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per between Ecuador and Mali?
0 units per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mali?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Mali rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per?
Ecuador ranks 99th and Mali ranks 102nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mali: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/mali/">Ecuador vs Mali: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 9,657 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.