How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malta?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Malta: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per

Cuba

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Malta

0 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Cuba rank

105th

Malta rank

108th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per over time

Cuba
Malta

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Cuba ranks 105th and Malta ranks 108th of 184 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Malta	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Malta
1970s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Malta
1980s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Malta
1990s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Malta
2000s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Malta
2010s	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	0 units per square kilometre	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per, Cuba or Malta?: Cuba, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Malta as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per between Cuba and Malta?: 0 units per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malta?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Cuba and Malta rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per?: Cuba ranks 105th and Malta ranks 108th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Malta: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/cuba/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/cuba/malta/">Cuba vs Malta: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 184 places, 9,657 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 19 August 2026

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.