Angola vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per

Angola
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo
0 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Angola rank
130th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
132nd

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per over time

  • Angola
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
00000196119902019

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 130th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 132nd of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Democratic Republic of Congo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Angola
1970s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
1980s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
1990s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Angola
2010s 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per, Angola or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Angola, at 0 units per square kilometre against 0 units per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per between Angola and Democratic Republic of Congo?
0 units per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Democratic Republic of Congo?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Angola and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - crop residues, per?
Angola ranks 130th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 132nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/angola/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-crop-residues-per-square-kilometre/angola/congo-dem-rep/">Angola vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 9,657 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.