Hong Kong, China vs Naoero: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per

Hong Kong, China
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Naoero
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
187th
Naoero rank
184th

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Naoero
0000196119902019

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Naoero's figure about 5.5 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 187th and Naoero ranks 184th of 191 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Naoero in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Naoero Difference Ahead
1970s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
1980s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Naoero
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Naoero
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Naoero
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per, Hong Kong, China or Naoero?
Naoero, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per between Hong Kong, China and Naoero?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Naoero?
50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong, China and Naoero rank globally for emission totals - indirect emissions (n2o) - agricultural soils, per?
Hong Kong, China ranks 187th and Naoero ranks 184th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Naoero: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-indirect-emissions-n2o-agricultural-soils-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/naoero/">Hong Kong, China vs Naoero: Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 9,477 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.